Showing posts with label Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2016

The Hateful Movie Column: An Interview with Lee Cruse


All of us have a film that we hate.

It could be for any number of reasons. The film could have an actor that we hate. It could be because it is based off of a book that the filmmakers have failed to adapt properly. Or it could just be that the film sucks really badly.

With that in mind, I am starting a new column. I have seen many interviews where people talk about the films that they love. The films that inspire them. Films that they consider classics. This column is going to be the opposite of that.

Bad films can stay with us for a long time. I believe that if you look deeper into it, you can find surprising things in a bad film. For instance, while there maybe a film that you really hate, that same film could contain a scene or a moment that you really enjoy. An example of this is 50 Shades of Grey. Most people that saw the movie hated it with a passion. Yet, how many people own the soundtrack that came from that film? It just goes to show you that just like life, you can find something good in even the worst of things.

So with that in mind, let's begin our new column....




Lee Cruse is considered one of the funniest people in the state of Kentucky. Every morning on LEX 18 News at Sunrise, you can watch Lee give his trademark wit and humor as he visit various local businesses around Lexington, KY and the surrounding areas.

I have worked with Lee for the last few years and like many people, Lee likes going to the movies. He sees a lot of films good and bad. One of those bad films is the topic of this column today.

The one film that Lee cannot stand is The Revenant



Lee and I talked quite a bit about this film and why he hates it. That made him the perfect person to interview for this column.



Steven Hash: So do you think that it was just the hype for the movie or is it just the fact that you didn't like the movie that made you really hate this film. Because it seems like the director, Alejandro G. Inarritu, the movies he does.... it seems like they go up for a lot of awards and you have people that really like the stuff he directs, but you also have just as many people who hate his movies as well. 

Lee Cruse: To me, the film was just pretentious. Maybe because of the hype. But I think some of the decisions he made were for the elongation of a film that needed to be 45 minutes shorter. That is just a director who has just fallen in love with his cinematographer and is really just allowing this to go on.

And then DiCaprio, who I like and is a great actor, and Alejandro who I love. I mean,  Birdman was  okay. But DiCaprio's performance, here is the thing about it. That performance was hyped and it got him an Academy Award when he has done so many other performances that were just so much better than that. He was just rolling around in the dirt grunting.



SH: Well it is weird because it did have a show off quality to it because on one hand, Yeah he grew a beard. He went out the middle of the cold, he even went into the inside of a horse. But there also is this quality to it that is just him basically saying "I want an Oscar and I want one really badly!" 

LC: Yeah. I mean, I assume the tumblers all worked out for him to win an award. I think it really was for more past efforts. I don't know how the voting works. But I really don't know if that was Oscar worthy because I don't know what he did that was so fantastic other than be in pain all day and having it sort of reflect my experience sitting in the theater all day watching this movie.

SH: Was there anything you liked about the movie at all? 

LC: The visuals! I love the visuals. I love the special effects and that is the thing with Alejandro and his cohorts, I don't know if there is anybody more cutting edge with the way they organically integrate effects (with the real world). For instance, that fight scene with DiCaprio and Tom Hardy. When he cuts Hardy's finger off, that one shot choreographed fight.... how the hell they pulled that off where he grabs the axe and rolls over and then there is the effect put into place. I mean, it is just really felt so real but that is just what they do and they do it better than anybody right now.

SH: Well even the scene with the horse, when it went over the cliff, if you watch the behind the scenes clips, it really is just DiCaprio in a room somewhere that is all green screen and they something marked off somewhere that says that "this is where the tree is." 


LC: But again, that is impressive but not as impressive as the knife fight one because that is a staged CGI moment. The fight itself had to be choreographed with the actors reacting to what is going to take place when the finger is dismembered. To integrate that organically where it is not staged, where it is like "Hey, we are getting ready to have a big moment." Visually (with the horse jumping scene) there is clues to let you know that "here's the cliff and the horse is jumping." With the fight, it is just this fantastic effect that is so organic, that it looks real!

SH: I agree with you on that. With that being said, is there a part of the movie that just bugs you the most? 

LC: I think just the agony of him dragging himself around forever and ever and ever, and I think we could have gotten rid of what seemed, to me, to be padding. I mean these are Oscar winners. All of them. Someone has got to make a decision here. Why are you putting your audience through this?... You are just so in love with it all. You can convey that in a montage and just put some "Mister Mister" music behind it and (Laughs)... just play them going through the wilderness for maybe three minutes and we are done! We don't need this!!

SH: Do you agree with the assertion that if there is one thing that Inarritu loves to do is to show suffering. Like all his movies are just about "SUFFERING." I mean, the term "grief porn" has been used to describe some of his films. Do you agree with that assertion at all? 

LC: I mean, that is just a showcase of his stuff, so maybe. It be nice to see a departure. You know, maybe just do a comedy? Maybe see him do something different.

SH: Well Birdman is comedic...

LC: Well frankly there is a lot of pain in that as well... (Laughs) Emotional pain mainly. I don't think that assertion is a knock, I think it is just the experiences of the stories he is telling. I don't have a problem with that. It was just that with this one, I felt that "Hey we spent all the money to come out here, we got this beautiful vista, let's continue to show it." And it's like (sighs) okay.

SH: Well I take it you think it should not have won Best Picture then. What do you think should have? 

LC: Well what were the other nominees again?

SH: Well you had Revenant, The Big Short,  you had Spotlight which won Best Picture...

LC: Again, I think Creed was really good. I don't know about Best Picture but I am still pissed off about Sylvester Stallone (not winning).

SH: Since you mentioned liking DiCaprio as an actor, is there another movie of his you would recommend to other people to watch? 

LC: The Departed. I love that one. It is fantastic. If it is on TV, I'll usually stop the channel and watch that.



SH: Right. that is one of my favorites. So any other final thoughts on The Revenant?

LC: Don't see it!  Other than for the scene with the bear, don't see it!






Well many thanks to Lee Cruse for sitting down with me and giving some criticism of The Revenant.

This Saturday, May 7th, Lee will be a part of LEX 18 and their live coverage from Churchill Downs of the Kentucky Derby.

Please leave a comment down below. Let me know if you agree or disagree with Lee on this movie.


- Hash


Wednesday, February 18, 2015

2015 Academy Awards Preview (or The Opinion of One Guy Who Has Seen Most of the Movies Nominated) Part Four

Best Director. A controversial category due to who is not nominated.


The fact that Ava Duvernay is not nominated for Best Director is criminal. Selma is an amazing film that was snubbed in many categories but this is where the snubbing of the film hurt the most. The Academy had a chance to make history by giving a directing nomination to a black woman for the first time. Instead, it played it safe with a couple of the choices here.

At least there are other people in this category who deserved to be here for films that are great. Also there is some curve balls being thrown in over who is going to win.

So with that, let's look at the category:



BEST DIRECTOR


Wes Anderson - The Grand Budapest Hotel

 Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu - Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) 

Richard Linklater - Boyhood

Bennett Miller - Foxcatcher 

Morten Tyldum - The Imitation Game 


Odd thing about this category is that you get the feeling of deja vu creeping up this year. In 2010, it was assumed that David Fincher was going to win Best Director for The Social Network. He won all the early critics awards. The movie was popular with critics and audiences. But slowly but surely, The King's Speech started winning major awards. Come Oscar night, it beat Social Network for best picture and director. In 2015, that same thing is going to happen again. This time, it is Richard Linklater who is going to end up losing. For most of the year, he has been the frontrunner to win best director. Boyhood and the way the film was shot over a 12 year period has been discussed at length since the film came out this summer. It is impressive for sure, especially since Linklater was able to keep the performances that good for that length of time. But lately, complaints about the story have popped up. Is it involving enough? Is the movie too slow? Is the movie too gimmicky? The film has been out for so long that people have begun to look for a better, sexier option and that option appears to be Birdman and it's director. Inarritu has been a favorite of the Academy for years. 21 Grams, Babel, and Biutiful have all gotten acclaim over the years but he has yet to win any awards for his work. That ends this Sunday. The competition otherwise doesn't look like it could knock either one of these two gentlemen out. Wes Anderson is finally getting some long overdue acclaim from the Academy for Grand Budapest, but the film seems to be more likely to win the technical awards than any of the major awards. Morten Tyldum is the newcomer in this group but his work on Imitation Game was good but nothing outstanding. (I would have switched his spot out with DuVernay and let her get the nomination over him.) And Bennett Miller continues to impress with his third directing nomination in a row for Foxcatcher but the coldness of the story seems to have turned people off. When it comes down to it, Academy members will give Innarritu the Oscar for the way he guided Birdman and got the great performances out of the film. It doesn't speak bad to Linklater, he is just losing to the sexier option at the moment. As it showed before in 2010, it happens sometimes. 


Should Win and Will Win: