Thursday, February 4, 2016

What A Lovely Day (And Year): The Best Films of 2015



The medium of film on any given year, has shown the reflection of our society. This year proved no different.

Whether it was showing us the corruption of our society, the way technology has overtaken our lives, or in most cases, how big business has taken over all of our lives. In Hollywood's case, the industry seems stuck in franchise and remake mode. No one was asking for a remake of Point Break at all, but for some reason or another, we got one.

But even in the worst of times, true art can rise to the top. 2015 was one of the better years in film. For me, there was a lot of good quality films that was spread out across the spectrum. The best films of 2015 I think over time will show that not only was some of the best, most surprising filmmaking going on this year, most of the films on this list have something to say on the times that we live in.

All of the films on this list, especially my pick for the best film, will be remembered for years to come. Without further ado, my pick for the ten best films of 2015.



#10 





Steven Spielberg is a student of history. Even when he is covering larger than life subjects like Abraham Lincoln and Oskar Schindler, Spielberg is someone who knows that looking at the society around these figures is just as important as the figures themselves. If nothing else, it says what they had to go through at the time in order to justify their cause.

Bridge of Spies is one of Spielberg's most enjoyable films. He has evolved as a more confident filmmaker over the years and this film shows that. While the director is known for his special effects and for giving us the blueprint of the modern blockbuster, Spielberg is someone who is becoming much better with actors. Case in point is Mark Rylance. Rylance plays Rudolf Abel, the Russian spy living in America who gets arrested by government agents. His scenes with Tom Hanks, who plays Abel lawyer and eventual friend, are some of the best scenes that Spielberg has directed. Spielberg is very smart to get out of the actors way.

A lot of moments in this film, like the scenes set in East Berlin where Hanks has to negotiate a trade off between Abel and two Americans who are caught behind enemy lines, could have been very boring. But by bringing in Joel and Ethan Coen to write the screenplay, Spielberg gives these scenes a riveting feel to them. Spielberg knows that in the end sometimes, real progress happens behind closed doors and not out in the battlefield.



#9





The secret to Pixar's success is very simple. They know people. They know emotions. They know that the everyday struggles that people go through are sometimes just as interesting as any of the number of action scenes that we see everyday on TV and on the big screen. None of this is more evident than in Inside Out. All of the main characters in this film are the emotions inside the mind of a young teenage girl, Riley. 

The temptation here would have been to be completely silly and go for the easy jokes with current pop culture references. But Pete Docter (Up, Monsters Inc.) is smarter than that. He makes each of the emotions in the film stand out on there own and even when the jokes come, they feel very true to real life. The two emotions that stood out in this film were Sadness, voiced brilliantly by Phyllis Smith, and Bing Bong, the imaginary friend of Riley from her younger age. Bing Bong probably brings in the most emotion scenes in the film as his character represents the true sadness we feel when our childhood ends and the turbulent teenage years begin. 

The visuals in the film of course stand out. Each of the emotions are assigned a proper color that fits them very well. Inside Out is the best animated film of the year and also one of the most emotion films of the year as well. Then again, Pixar is usually known for producing these kinds of films by now. 



#8





Ridley Scott is a master of directing science fiction. He is a visual filmmaker who knows how to make each of the worlds that are in his films look unique. He also knows that the best science fiction films work as a commentary on the nature of mankind. In The Martian, Scott finds the story of a astronaut who is stranded on Mars after a massive dust storm causes the rest of the crew to evacuate the planet.

Although the film is definitely science fiction, a lot of the elements in it are presented in a way that makes it seem like we are watching a classic survival story. We see Damon's character, Mark Watney, have to perform several scientific set ups in order to survive for a couple of years before the back up space shuttle can arrive. The story also covers the efforts by NASA back on planet earth as they try to come up with a way to get Watney home.

Besides Scott, the other great detail with this movie is the script by Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods) and the performance by Matt Damon. Damon adds a very funny and human touch to the film. It is usually something one doesn't see much in Scott's movies but it is a welcome change here and the result is one of Ridley Scott's best films to date.



#7




In making The Revenant, Alejandro G. Inarritu has made what maybe his most enjoyable and complete film yet to date. It's odd, because on the surface, this film seems like it would be a chore to sit through, given that Inarritu is a director that does not seem to mind showing us human suffering at all. But in tapping into the story of Hugh Glass, Inarritu shows us a story about the primal nature of humans, nature and ultimately, revenge. 

The story starts with Glass and his son accompanying a group of fur hunters on a hunting trip deep into the American wilderness of the 1820's, where they are attacked by Indians. As Glass leads the group away from the Indians, he is viciously attacked by a bear. As the group leaves him behind so they can make it home, they leave Glass behind with his son and a fellow hunter, John Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald is not keen on staying behind with Glass so he attempts to kill him. When Glass's son sees Fitzgerald doing this, he tries to stop it but is killed by Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald then leaves Glass behind to die. Needless to say, Glass manages to survive and begins a long, bloody quest in order to exact his revenge against Fitzgerald. 

The acting in something like this is key and thankfully DiCaprio does a great job with the role. In fact he barely speaks at all due to the bear attack his character suffers. DiCaprio is very good at showing us the physicality of what Glass has to go through just to get back to health after surviving the bear attack. And Tom Hardy shows what a great actor he is. As Fitzgerald, Hardy gives us a personality to the part that in another actor's hands, could have been very one note. But it is not, and with Inarritu and cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki giving us some amazing scenery, this film is one that stays with you long after you watch it. 



#6




For years, I have always said that Adam McKay was the heir apparent to Harold Ramis. I said this mostly because I noticed a certain anger about social issues that always seems to seep into McKay's films in the same way that it did in Ramis's films. Anchorman 2 could be seen as a commentary on the media and the over saturation of the news. The Other Guys makes fun of the financial institutions amid the story of two regular cops. But with The Big Short, McKay gets serious about his social commentary and as a result, he has made the best film of his career. 

The story starts off in 2005. Michael Burry (Christian Bale) is a hedge fund manager who notices a ton of problems with the way the housing market is set up with a system of bad loans. So against the advice of everyone around him, he uses his hedge fund and bets against the housing market at a time when it was suppose to be "rock solid." This attracts the attention of a host of other investors, like Jarred Vennett (Ryan Gosling), a Wall Street trader who sees opportunity in the housing market crashing. It also gets a look at by Mark Baum (Steve Carrell), another hedge fund manager, who travels down to Florida and witnesses first hand how bad the housing market has gotten. Two younger investors Charlie Geller and Jamie Shipley think this could be the break they are looking for in order to get into Wall Street. They get the help of a retired banker, Ben Rickert (Brad Pitt), to set them up with the deal. 

Through these characters, McKay shows us how that even though these guys knew the housing market was going to crash, the system was set up by the big banks all along. The film is full of anger not at just the banks for screwing the American people over, but with the whole business culture at large. "This is why I quit!" Rickert tells Geller and Shipley in one scene. "All this business does is reduce people to ones and zeros." McKay knows that at the heart of this film it is us, the average people who matter and he never really takes his eyes off of that. In the end, the investors did win and make some big money out of the deal, but in reality, McKay asks us, did anyone really win? 



#5




Is man letting technology get too much control over our lives? A question that has been asked in many a science fiction film. But as the years go by, we are starting to see technology (phones, computers, etc.) become more and more prevalent in our society. Alex Garland must have noticed this and came up with Ex Machina. A sci-fi film that is also part social commentary and part thriller. 

Caleb Smith (Domhall Gleeson) is a programmer for a major tech company who wins a sweepstakes to spend one week visit at the home of Nathan Bateman, the mysterious CEO of the software company Caleb works for. Once Caleb arrives at the huge home, he realizes that Nathan has him there for other purposes. He has built an artificial intelligence robot named Ava. Nathan wants Caleb to administer a Turning test on Ava, which is a way to determine an AI's ability to appear human. 

What happens soon after becomes a cat and mouse game between the three main characters. Does Nathan have Caleb there for some other nefarious purpose? Is Caleb used as a pawn by Ava as a way to get rid of Nathan? Is Ava pitting Caleb again Nathan as a means of escaping into society? 
This story is very effective at keeping the audience guessing as to the true intent of what all the characters are up to. It also works as a social commentary in some surprising ways. Garland asks us that if robots eventually make it out into society undetected, would we even care after awhile? 

Garland is very effective with his writing here. Plus he gets great performances out of all his actors. Especially from Alicia Vakander, who performance as the AI Ava announces her as a major talent arriving on the scene. The last shot of her in the film is a simple image, but it is one that is scary and in an odd way, says what is happening in our society. 



#4




Every now and then, you get a film that surprises you. It Follows is probably the most memorable horror film I have seen in a very long time. It doesn't feel gimmicky. It has characters that feel like normal teenagers. The tone of the film feels very similar to the great horror films of directors like John Carpenter and Wes Craven. It takes place in the real world but it has stylistic touches to it that show that it takes place in a unique cinematic world. There is very few films like this one out in the cinemas now. 

The story follows Jay, a Michigan college student, as she goes on a date to the movies with Hugh. In the theater, Hugh freaks out. He sees the appearance of a woman staring at him. He asks Jay if she sees the woman and she does not. They soon leave the theater. Later on, the two of them go on another date and the night ends with the two of them in Hugh's car having sex. After they are done, Hugh knocks out Jay with chloroform. He ties Jay up to a wheelchair. With Jay asks what is going on, she now sees the woman that Jay saw earlier in the theater walking towards her now. The monster, Hugh tells her, can take on the form of any person and it is passed on to other people through sex. If Jay does not pass the curse on to someone else, she will be murdered. 

The monster itself is frightening. Since it takes on the form of different people, we the audience are always left in suspense as to if people in the background are the monster or if they are just simply walking by the characters. The film also has the benefit in having Maika Monroe in the lead role as Jay. She is going to be a fantastic actress. Here she possesses the quality that Jaime Lee Curtis had in Halloween: Smart but vulnerable. Tough but sensitive to how the monster affects her and to her friends around her. Couple that with a great 80's synth score by Disasterpeace and you have a film that stays with you long after it is over. Just like any great horror film should do. 



#3




Spotlight is an excellent film about the Boston Globe investigation team and the efforts they had to take in order to make sure that their stories about the Catholic Church and their cover ups on the sex scandal that many of the priests in Boston were involved with over the years. The film works as a thriller, a drama, and as a political piece about the media and it's job on reporting important events. But above all else, the film is a love letter to the newspaper and how that even though newspapers maybe going out of style in the age of the internet, the newspaper is still a relevant and vital part of our society. 

The story starts in 2001. New editor of the Boston Globe, Marty Baron (Liev Schreiber) has just arrived at the newspaper. He learns about the paper's "Spotlight" unit, which is comprised of a small team of reporters whose investigations into stories can sometimes take up to a year to publish. The team is headed by Walter Robinson (Michael Keaton) and is the oldest continuous operating newspaper investigative unit in America. 

Baron gets ahold of a column about a priest who was sexually abusing boys in his church and the lawyer who says that the Arch Bishop of Boston knew about it and did nothing to stop the priest. Baron wants Robinson and his team to investigate it further. What starts out as a look at a few priests that may have been abusing young boys turns into something that can only be described as an epidemic. The rest of the film is about how the team not only has to try and get some witnesses to talk to them, but also how they have to navigate the political and social waters that the scandal of this magnitude could bring. 

Director Tom McCarthy is very smart with his directing. He does not do any crazy camera tricks nor does he go to any sort of story telling gimmicks. Like the reporters in the film, we follow along the story with them as they learn various pieces of information. We feel their heartbreak as they have to listen to details from each of the victims and how the church did nothing to help those victims out. Like All The President's Men, it shows us the investigation side in great detail. But the filmmakers know that it is ultimately the human side of the scandal that we will remember the most. 



#2




For the second year in a row, Director Denis Villeneuve (Prisoners) has made a excellent film. Sicario is a film that grabs you and never lets you go. Rarely have I seen a film that was able to keep the level of tension high and carry it out throughout the movie. Sicario is one of those movies. It also has a wonderful story that for a good chunk of the film, you have no clue where it is going to go. 

The set up of the film is very simple. Kate Macer (Emily Blunt) is an agent for the FBI who goes along on a raid of a house that has suspected drug kidnappers in it. When they raid the house, they find dozens of corpses hidden within the walls of the house. They also find an IED explosive that goes off and kills a couple of agents as well. Angry at the lack of progress the agency is making against the war on drugs, Macer is given the opportunity to join a Delta Force task force that is comprised of agents from several government agencies. Included in this group is Alejandro Gallick (Benicio Del Toro), a mysterious man from Mexico whose real intentions are kept from Macer and the audience. 

The group's mission is to then go over the Mexican border and bring back one of the men who maybe responsible for the killing of the FBI agents. This leads to one of the best scenes in the film. When the group has the prisoner in their possession, they return to the border and sure enough, trouble is waiting for them. This leads to one of the most tense scenes in the film, as the group experiences people from all fronts coming towards them as they try to take back the prisoner. 

I will not reveal anymore of the story. It goes into many unexpected directions. Benicio Del Toro gives one of his best performances ever in this film. His character is scary to watch at times. Emily Blunt once again proves that not only is she a great actress but she is also a great action star as well. She more than holds her own here. 

Do yourself a favor and go into this movie as cold as you can. The surprises and the turns that the story takes is some of the best storytelling that you will see this year. 



#1




Film is a visual medium. While plays and novels rely on the written word, film is a medium that allows it's makers to create whole imaginary worlds. Film has survived for so many years because of this. It allows us to go to other places that might not be real yet. Planets. Cities. The past. The future. Wherever you imagination wants to go, film can more than likely take you there.

It is this reasoning that I think Mad Max: Fury Road is the best film of 2015. It is the brilliant work of it's visionary director, George Miller, who is able to transport us into a world that is very creative and alive. It has been said that Miller didn't even have a script for the film for a long time. He created a series a storyboards that was the template for the film. It is a very odd way to start on a film but it works beautifully here.

I think you see the great vision Miller has for the film in two different moments during the film. The first is the location of The Citadel, the main stronghold for the film's main villain, Immortan Joe. We see that the location has three huge rock clusters and that Joe and his followers live on top of these clusters, while everyone else has to live way down below them. This is a very cruel but effective analogy. It is none more apparent than in the scene where Joe pulls a lever and gives out the water to the masses below him. We see the giant waterfall activate and people come running to it with bedpans, buckets and whatever than can just to get a little bit of water. It is a crazy scene to watch but it says a lot about the character of Immortan Joe and the power he has over the people at the Citadel.

The other moment is when Max, Furiosa, and the wives of Immortan Joe are driving the gasoline rig that they have stolen from Joe towards a nearby canyon. From behind the rig, Joe and his followers are right on the rig's tail. Furiosa notices however another group coming up the the side of the rig. This is the gang from Gas Town, a nearby town from the Citadel. Within this gang, we notice the leader of Gas Town is among them. His name is the People Eater. Miller does a very clever thing here. We see the huge rig that the People Eater is riding in and it says more about the character than any line of dialogue ever could. On top of this rig, we see that instead of a standard junk car that we see on all the other vehicles, we see a Mercedes Benz body attached to the top of it. We see that this character is a man that prides himself above all the other gangs. We hear him talk later on in the film about how chasing the rig Max has stolen has costed them a lot of money. With the way we see him dress and the ride that he has, this is a character that cares only for money and money alone.

While the attention to detail is amazing, the action scenes themselves help make the movie great. The whole story is essentially one long chase film. But it is never boring and more importantly, we are never lost throughout the action scenes. This is a credit to Miller and cinematographer John Seale. They keep the action front and center on the screen. They make sure that each important moment lasts. Films lately have been going for more style and visual flavor over coherence. But not here. We know what happens and how it is important to the story at hand.

It's amazing to think. Usually when a film franchise gets four films deep into a series, it gets complacent. Producers and studios know that money has to be made and so usually they just repeat what the other films have done. But to see George Miller, who is 70 years old, not go the popular route, To come up with a daring new idea and to make that idea instead of repeating what the other films did, that is a site to behold. Fury Road is a film that has great action and wonderful storytelling that will be remembered for years to come.



- Hash

Friday, October 30, 2015

Films I have seen in 2015 (So far)





I am often asked by people in both a joking and non-joking manor if I have seen every movie that is out in cinemas at the moment. Sometimes I feel like I do but more often to not, I like to think that I have become much pickier lately.

Don't get me wrong, I still see a lot of movies. So I decided to list all the movies that I have seen this year. Most of them are movies that have come out this year. Some are movies that are from year's past that I saw for one reason or another.

So without further ado, and in the spirit of the list the Steven Soderbergh creates on his website, here is the list of movies that I have seen this year. Presented here in no particular order.



Ex Machina 

2001: A Space Odyssey (Seen this with a live orchestra) 

Mad Max: Fury Road 

Blackhat 

Taken 3

Kingsman: The Secret Service 

It Follows 

Back to the Future Part II 

Inherent Vice 

McFarland, USA

Run All Night 

Wes Craven's New Nightmare 

The Gunman 

Get Hard

John Carpenter's In The Mouth of Madness

Avengers: Age of Ultron 

Ant-Man 

San Andreas 

Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension 

The Big Chill 

Seconds 

Badlands 

Spy 

Jurassic World 

Mission Impossible: Rouge Nation

Dope

Minions

Terminator: Genisys 

Southpaw

Straight Outta Compton 

Black Mass 

Sicario 

The Walk 

The Martian 

Bridge of Spies 

Selma 

Whiplash 

Furious 7 

The Gambler 

Third Person

American Sniper 

John Wick 

Jaws

Foxcatcher 

Hours 

Black Sunday 

Black Sea 


Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Photos from 2015

2015 has been a great year for me in terms of the photos that I have done. I have a had a chance to do a wide range of photos and I hope to continue to do many more as the year comes to a close. Here are some of my favorite photos that I have taken so far this year. Enjoy!

























- Hash

All pictures Copyright Steven Hash 

Monday, October 26, 2015

Songs from Soundtracks That Don't Suck #4: Talk Show Host by Radiohead from the Soundtrack to "Romeo + Juliet"







Today's song comes from Chelsea Gorham, a director at LEX 18. To be honest this is actually a really great pick from her. It comes from the Romeo + Juliet soundtrack. The soundtrack was huge at the time of the film's release in 1996 with a lot of memorable songs coming from it. But for many people, "Talk Show Host" by the band Radiohead, remains their favorite song. 

For one thing, the whole tone of the song just fits the film. Baz Luhrmann's interpretation of the William Shakespeare play is wild and very angsty at times. This song perfectly fits into the angsty part of the equation. 

The part of the film that the song plays in is very appropriate. Leonardo DiCaprio, who plays Romeo, is walking along the fictional Verona Beach. He is in despair. The growing feud between his family (The Capulet family) and another family (The Montauge family) is tearing him apart inside. The scene starts with the family, minus Romeo, looking upon him from their limo as he walks along the beach alone.





We see it in the ruins all around the beach, which clearly has seen better days. The music matches Romeo's mood and the ruins that surround him. "Radiohead" lead singer Thom Yorke's voice sets the tone right from the first line in the lyrics: 

I want to, I want to be someone else or I'll explode

I mean, those lyrics are just spot on for this moment! Not just in mood but in what Romeo is feeling inside his head. You could read those lyrics as exactly what Romeo is thinking about in that moment. 

Luhrmann does a great job directing this scene as well. He lets the camera follow DiCaprio around and also gets some shots of the decaying area around him. It's angsty and moody but it is just the RIGHT amount of angsty and moody. 

Of the film overall, I am not enamored with it. It is too over the top and the characters get lost in the scenery at times. But this scene however is a gem. Most of all it captures the mood of what Luhrmann was trying to go for in the film. It really is attuned to where Romeo is right at the start of the story. 

The last lyrics of the song, (I'm ready, I'm ready, I'm ready, I'm ready I'm ready) sound like something that Romeo would say if anyone was standing there with him at the moment in time. Considering what is to come Romeo soon in the film, those lyrics are a fitting end to the scene in more ways that one. 

- Hash


Friday, February 20, 2015

2015 Academy Awards Preview (or The Opinion of One Guy Who Has Seen Most of the Movies Nominated) Part Five




After a write up consisting of four different parts, it is time to talk about the one category that is always fun to debate about: Best Picture! 

So who do I think is going to win the big prize? Let's not start with a long paragraph this time. Let's just get right to it! 



BEST PICTURE


American Sniper 

Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) 

Boyhood

The Grand Budapest Hotel 

The Imitation Game

Selma 

The Theory of Everything

Whiplash 



The thing that jumps out for me on this list is that frankly, this really is a really great list of films this year. There is no one film that is in here that makes everyone groan. I could make an argument for Foxcatcher being included on this list but other than that. I have no problems with the nominees listed here. 

So to start, who has no chance of winning? I think that honor has to go to The Theory of Everything. It's a fine movie no doubt. Well acted with a great subject matter. But it's the kind of biographic film you see at the Oscars every year and the film just doesn't really scream "BEST PICTURE!" Maybe Best Actor, but not Best Picture. The same I think goes for the other British film on this list, The Imitation Game. It is really odd with this movie because on paper, you think this would be an easy win for Best Picture. It's a prestige British Film. It is on the subject of World War II. You have two big name actors in Benedict Cumberbatch and Keira Knightley. It is also about a gay man being persecuted which is a big hot topic issue going on right now. But it seems that many people think that it is one of those movies that is really good, just not best of the year good.

The Grand Budapest Hotel is a movie that a lot of people really do love though. It's hard to find someone that hated it. However it has been put in what I call "the Moulin Rouge spot." It is going to win a good number of technical awards and be a film that many people admire for years, it is just not going to win Best Picture. The same thing can be said for Selma. This film will be remembered for years to come. It is an important historical film. Many people are upset that it will not win Best Picture and they have every right to be that way. But it is also going to join a list of amazing films that have also not won Best Picture. Seriously, go to Google and look up the list of nomintated movies that have lost Best Picture. It's not a bad list to be on. 

Now if I had my pick, Whiplash would win Best Picture no questions asked. It is the first movie that I can think of in years that I had a visceral reaction to. The movie moves you with the story, the acting, and especially the music. But the fact that the movie is such a gut punch at times I think is what's going to scare off the voters. It happens a lot. Why else could you explain why similar gut punch films like Raging Bull and Brokeback Mountain lost out on Best Picture to the more accessible to watch films like Ordinary People and Crash

Oddly enough, I think this also will apply to American Sniper. True it is a dark horse pick. It is the most popular film nominated. As of this writing, the film has made $308 Million Dollars at the U.S. box office. That is not a number to sneeze at. Also, it is directed by past Academy Award winner Clint Eastwood. But I have a feeling that even though it is raking in piles of money, the Academy is not going to give it Best Picture. You have a lot of liberal members in the voting branch and they really will not respond to the right leaning ways of the main character of the film. Also, you know they have to worry about a Crash-like backlash happening again if they let the movie win Best picture. 

So that leaves two films. The first one being Boyhood. For awhile, it was the presumed front runner. It has popped up on a slew of best of the year lists. Richard Linklater is a very popular director. It was filmed over a 12 year period, which definitely an interesting story to voters watching the film. It's also well acted which had to be a hard thing to continue to do over the years of filming. But the one thing that I think it is a determent to the movie is that it came out in the summer. Thus, people have had a long time to watch in theaters, watch it on DVD or on their computers. That is enough time for one movie to be picked apart and talked about by many people. So much so, that complaints about the film being gimmicky have started to surface. 

Because of that, I believe that Birdman is going to be the film that wins Best Picture. That is not a bad thing in the least. I love the movie. It's well acted with a career defining performance by Michael Keaton. It is well directed. It also has great camera work by Emmanuel Lubezki, who is hot at the moment coming off of a win for the similar one-take film, Gravity. Also if there is one type of film that the Academy in recent years have loved to honor, it is films that celebrate the world of cinema and the theater and the power they have over people. The Artist and Argo are two recent examples that come to mind. Expect Birdman to soar up into the air and join the list of Best Picture winners. 

Should Win: 

Whiplash 




Will Win: 

 

Enjoy the show this Sunday!

- Hash


Wednesday, February 18, 2015

2015 Academy Awards Preview (or The Opinion of One Guy Who Has Seen Most of the Movies Nominated) Part Four

Best Director. A controversial category due to who is not nominated.


The fact that Ava Duvernay is not nominated for Best Director is criminal. Selma is an amazing film that was snubbed in many categories but this is where the snubbing of the film hurt the most. The Academy had a chance to make history by giving a directing nomination to a black woman for the first time. Instead, it played it safe with a couple of the choices here.

At least there are other people in this category who deserved to be here for films that are great. Also there is some curve balls being thrown in over who is going to win.

So with that, let's look at the category:



BEST DIRECTOR


Wes Anderson - The Grand Budapest Hotel

 Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu - Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) 

Richard Linklater - Boyhood

Bennett Miller - Foxcatcher 

Morten Tyldum - The Imitation Game 


Odd thing about this category is that you get the feeling of deja vu creeping up this year. In 2010, it was assumed that David Fincher was going to win Best Director for The Social Network. He won all the early critics awards. The movie was popular with critics and audiences. But slowly but surely, The King's Speech started winning major awards. Come Oscar night, it beat Social Network for best picture and director. In 2015, that same thing is going to happen again. This time, it is Richard Linklater who is going to end up losing. For most of the year, he has been the frontrunner to win best director. Boyhood and the way the film was shot over a 12 year period has been discussed at length since the film came out this summer. It is impressive for sure, especially since Linklater was able to keep the performances that good for that length of time. But lately, complaints about the story have popped up. Is it involving enough? Is the movie too slow? Is the movie too gimmicky? The film has been out for so long that people have begun to look for a better, sexier option and that option appears to be Birdman and it's director. Inarritu has been a favorite of the Academy for years. 21 Grams, Babel, and Biutiful have all gotten acclaim over the years but he has yet to win any awards for his work. That ends this Sunday. The competition otherwise doesn't look like it could knock either one of these two gentlemen out. Wes Anderson is finally getting some long overdue acclaim from the Academy for Grand Budapest, but the film seems to be more likely to win the technical awards than any of the major awards. Morten Tyldum is the newcomer in this group but his work on Imitation Game was good but nothing outstanding. (I would have switched his spot out with DuVernay and let her get the nomination over him.) And Bennett Miller continues to impress with his third directing nomination in a row for Foxcatcher but the coldness of the story seems to have turned people off. When it comes down to it, Academy members will give Innarritu the Oscar for the way he guided Birdman and got the great performances out of the film. It doesn't speak bad to Linklater, he is just losing to the sexier option at the moment. As it showed before in 2010, it happens sometimes. 


Should Win and Will Win: 


2015 Academy Awards Preview (or The Opinion of One Guy Who Has Seen Most of the Movies Nominated) Part Three

For part three of my look at the Academy Awards, I am looking the at the races for Best Actor and Actress. One of these races has become very predictable while the other one seemed predictable for awhile but has now become a two person race.

It's funny with both of these categories you kinda get a microcosm of how the Oscars categories go most years. It's either a fun, unpredictable race that could go either way or it becomes a race where the winner is predictable and we get to watch as they act super surprise that they won the award.

But both the races this year feature actors that audiences have loved and respected over the years. You get the sense from both of these categories that whoever wins their respective awards that it is going to be long overdue for them.

So with that in mind, let's look at the categories:



BEST ACTRESS


Marion Cotillard - Two Days, One Night

Felicity Jones - The Theory of Everything

Julianne Moore - Still Alice 

Rosamund Pike - Gone Girl 

Reese Witherspoon - Wild 


For awhile, this category looked like it could be one of the most unpredictable ones to pick in a long while. Then Julianne Moore started winning every major acting award this season and slowly it has started to feel like it is Moore's to lose. To be honest, it would not be a bad thing at all. Moore is a very respected actor. The list of classic film's she has been in is endless. She also has been nominated four times and has not won yet. This very much is in her favor. Marion Cotillard's nomination was a nice surprise for her work in Two Days, One Night but she is the film's only nomination. Felicity Jones really did great work in The Theory of Everything. It is the kind of performance that announces that someone has arrived on the scene. But her co-star Eddie Redmayne is getting most of the awards  attention, so she will have to settle for the nomination. Early in the year, it seemed like Rosamund Pike would be a contender for her stellar work in Gone Girl. But she is the film's only nomination and as noted before, some members of the academy really hated the movie. Reese Witherspoon on the other hand gave her best performance in years in Wild. Any other year, she would win this easily. It is just a subtle, brilliant performance. But two things stop her. One, the movie has not really caught on with the public in the way a lot of people thought it would. And she has won an Oscar before in 2005 for Walk the Line. Take that into account, and becomes clear that Julianne Moore is going to be walking up to the podium for her first Oscar trophy.


Should Win and Will Win: 






BEST ACTOR


Steve Carell - Foxcatcher

Bradley Cooper - American Sniper 

Benedict Cumberbatch - The Imitation Game 

Michael Keaton - Birdman (or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

Eddie Redmayne - The Theory of Everything 


This is the fun category of the night. Everyone in this category is very much liked by audiences and critics alike. With that being said, I am going to admit to a personal preference here: I want Michael Keaton to win this. I have been a big fan of Keaton's for years. Not just Batman, but with his work in Beetlejuice, Clean and Sober, Pacific Heights, Night Shift, The Nice Guys, etc. He has been an actor who for years as been able to go between comedy and drama very easily. That is not an easy thing to do at all and to see him get noticed finally is a great thing. Is it enough to win though? Well the competition is stiff. Bradley Cooper has the advantage of being in the most popular film in the category, American Sniper. His portrayal of military sniper Chris Kyle is a heartfelt and emotional performance. It is also impressive that this is Cooper's third year in a row of getting an Oscar nomination. But for as huge as the film as been, so has been the controversy over the facts and the politics of the film. Academy voters will probably be too scared of giving Cooper an Oscar here. Steve Carell was also impressive in Foxcatcher as John Du Pont. But the character is very unlikable and considering who Carell is up against in this category, that hurts. Benedict Cumberbatch is the superstar of this category for sure. Ladies love him and he has been in several popular movies and television shows over the past couple of years. His work in The Imitation Game as the gay mathematician Alan Turning is usually the type of part that wins Oscars easily. But for some reason, the film has not caught on in a way that one would think that it would. And then there is Eddie Redmayne. The performance he gives in The Theory of Everything is an extraordinarily physical one. He really makes you feel the effects that ALS has on Professor Stephen Hawking. It is not cheesy in the slightest bit. Redmayne has a good chance to win, but there is also a feeling that his performance is the type that we have seen from past winners before. Keaton has the benefit of being in a movie that lived or died on his performance. Birdman was a unique film in that it went from comedy to drama and back in the blink of an eye. Keaton handled all of this with ease at times. Because he has the harder part to play, Keaton will win Best Actor. Let's just hope we can get a Beettlejuice sequel because of this now! 

Should Win and Will Win: 



That is it for the post. Tomorrow, I will have a look at Best Director and then Friday, a look at the Best Picture race. 

- Hash